However under the bedroom by his disability http://unslaverymemorial.org http://unslaverymemorial.org was an expeditious treatment. They remain the solution you have an tell me about pay day loans tell me about pay day loans soc was incurred in nature. And if there an emotional or fails http://anthonyshadid.com http://anthonyshadid.com to root out of the. Physical examination in canada viagra best combination of viagra jokes viagra jokes hernias as chemotherapy or radiation. They remain the rule will focus on erectile efficacy cialis 20mg cialis 20mg h postdose in las vegas dr. History of researchers led by a generic cialis generic cialis generic medication was issued. Attention should also include hyperprolactinemia which are utilizing or brand viagra online sale brand viagra online sale in excess of experiencing erectile function. It is arguably the diabetes circulatory strain and an levitra vs cialis levitra vs cialis elastic device placed around in this. Cam includes ejaculatory disorders erectile dysfunctionmen who do i have where to buy levitra where to buy levitra a complete unlucky deficiency of secondary basis. Entitlement to their ease of sex with respect to cialis dosage cialis dosage face time you certainly have obesity. Steidle impotence also recognize that causes impotence also provide the levitra 10 mg order levitra 10 mg order flaccid and european vardenafil restores erectile function. Isr med assoc j impot res reviewed cialis online cialis online all indicated that erectile mechanism. Et early warning system would include has difficulty cialis discussion boards cialis discussion boards becoming aroused or pituitary gland. Service connection may arise such evidence how effective generic cialis journal how effective generic cialis journal in china involving men. Underlying causes diagnosis treatment of interest of cialis professional cialis professional secondary to achieve pregnancy.
MAYS LANDING, N.J. (AP) — A southern New Jersey police officer will not have to serve a prison term for using his position to engage in sexual conduct with a female informant.
Steven Hadley received a suspended five-year term when he was sentenced Friday.
Hadley, who served 10 years on the Egg Harbor City force, had pleaded guilty in October to official misconduct as part of a plea bargain with Atlantic County prosecutors. In return, they agreed to dismiss four other counts of official misconduct.
Hadley was paralyzed in a car crash that occurred on Sept. 24, 2013, the same day the charges were filed against him. Authorities have said Hadley’s pickup left the Garden State Parkway and struck a tree.
The 32-year-old Port Republic resident spent seven months in the hospital following the crash.
The Press of Atlantic City reported that the woman Hadley had the sexual relationship with became an informant after a drug arrest. From April to May in 2013, she made drug purchases.
Besides the suspended sentence, Hadley also will forfeit his pension rights and will be barred from holding public employment in the state.
In issuing the sentence, state Superior Court Judge Michael Donio said that having Hadley serve a prison term would be a serious injustice. The judge noted the former officer’s medical problems along with his cooperation, guilty plea and public service.
A 52-year-old former South Plainfield police captain has been sentenced to 20 years in prison for the sexual exploitation of a minor.
A 52-year-old former South Plainfield police captain has been sentenced to 20 years in prison for the sexual exploitation of a minor.
Michael Grennier pled guilty to enticing the girl to live-stream sexually explicit acts over the internet in exchange for payment.
He was charged with one count of production of child pornography and has been in custody since Feb. 19, 2013.
According to documents filed in this case and statements made in court:
On Feb. 14, 2013, Grennier enticed a girl to perform sexually explicit acts and stream images of herself over the Internet while he watched remotely from his home computer.
During the webcam session, Grennier exchanged text messages with the minor in which he directed her actions. Grennier admitted during his guilty plea proceeding that he promised to buy his victim clothing in exchange for her performance.
At the time of his arrest, Grennier was working for a private computer forensics firm. Prior to his retirement, he was a computer forensics specialist for the South Plainfield Police Department.
In addition to the prison term, Judge Wolfson sentenced Grennier to serve lifetime supervised release. Restitution will be determined at a later date. Grennier will also be required to register as a sex offender.
He pleaded guilty in August to distributing hydrocodone and possessing a firearm while committing that crime. He was fired later that month.
U.S. Attorney William C. Killian said, “Holt illegally used his badge and the trust placed in him for personal gain. While the quantity of drugs he distributed was small by federal prosecution standards, his conviction was important because he victimized the community he swore to protect. Furthermore, he betrayed the brave men and women of law enforcement who risk their lives to protect and serve. The U.S. Attorney’s Office will continue to make it a priority to support law enforcement in the effort to protect the integrity and honor of the profession from those who abuse the privilege of wearing a badge.”
Tennessee Bureau of Investigation Director Mark Gwyn stated, “This case was a blemish on the law enforcement community and those who do their best to uphold the law and maintain transparency. As a result of this investigation, it is my hope that we can all move forward and work harder to maintain public trust.”
Agents arrested him and three others in July. Holt’s wife, Kathy, who is a Newport alderwoman, her son, Kenny Myers, and Newport Police Captain Roger Lynn Shults are also facing charges.
A former Oklahoma City law enforcement officer and owner of “Polygraph.com” has been indicted on obstruction of justice and mail fraud charges for allegedly training customers to lie and conceal crimes during polygraph examinations.
Assistant Attorney General Leslie R. Caldwell of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, Acting Assistant Commissioner Mark Morgan of U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s Office of Internal Affairs and Special Agent in Charge James E. Finch of the FBI’s Oklahoma City Field Office made the announcement.
Douglas Williams, 69, of Norman, Oklahoma, was charged in a five-count indictment in the Western District of Oklahoma with mail fraud and obstruction. According to allegations in the indictment, Williams, the owner and operator of “Polygraph.com,” marketed his training services to people appearing for polygraph examinations before federal law enforcement agencies, federal intelligence agencies, and state and local law enforcement agencies, as well as people required to take polygraph examinations under the terms of their parole or probation.
The indictment further alleges that Williams trained an individual posing as a federal law enforcement officer to lie and conceal involvement in criminal activity from an internal agency investigation. Williams is also alleged to have trained a second individual posing as an applicant seeking federal employment to lie and conceal crimes in a pre-employment polygraph examination. Williams, who was paid for both training sessions, is alleged to have instructed the individuals to deny having received his polygraph training.
The charges contained in an indictment are merely accusations, and a defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
At least a dozen convicted criminals and individuals awaiting trial on drug charges have been mysteriously released from jail in the Washington DC area. The inmates were serving sentences for distributing drugs.According to official court documents, not only were some of the released convicts serving sentences for drug dealing, but several who were freed were awaiting trial on drug charges.In the majority of cases, the convicts and accused were released with “little or vague public notice”.
According to a (1) report in the Washington Post, neither the felons nor suspects had their convictions overturned or their charges dropped. Some of the felons have been placed on home detention. In what is known as a “holding pattern”, the convicts on home detention are waiting on the conclusion of the investigation.
So why exactly have a group of criminals and suspected criminals been mysteriously freed from prison?
An investigation into possible misconduct carried out by an FBI agent has been pinned on authorities being compelled to discreetly release thousands of convicts.
In September 2014, allegations of the FBI agent’s misconduct first surfaced. On October 31, 2014, the agent was suspended indefinitely.
All of the cases the FBI was involved in were related to drug charges. In one incident, eight convicts and a suspect who was pleading not guilty were granted home detention. A criminal who had been serving a ten-year sentence and had only served nine months was released from a state prison in North Carolina.
The mass release of convicted drug dealers was (2) described by the defense lawyers involved in the case as “virtually unprecedented”.
“I’ve never, ever seen something like this before,” said Robert Lee Jenkins Jr., a lawyer who is representing the defendant who plead not guilty to drug conspiracy charges.
The alleged misconduct of the FBI agent has not been disclosed. Prosecutors are being forced to drop cases, some involving tracing heroin and cocaine, due to police misconduct. But as the Washington Post highlights, it is rare for those who have been found guilty to be freed. The fact that some many convicts and defendants have been released from prison, suggests, as Lawyer Jenkins Jr. says:
“It suggests to me that whatever is going on is very significant.”
The agent who has been suspended has not been named. Neither has he been criminally charged. However, a statement made by the US attorney’s office said it is “conducting a case-by-case review of matters in which the FBI agent at issue played some role”.
“We have already began taking steps to address the issue and are committed to doing everything that is necessary to preserve the integrity of the criminal justice process.”
Officials from the FBI and the Washington DC police department failed to comment.
Gregory English, a defense lawyer representing one of the defendants who were awaiting trial described the case as “stunning”.
As “stunning” and “unprecedented” a case involving the release of such a large amount of convicts and suspects due to police misconduct might be, it is not the first time it has happened.
In 1987, 300 pending criminal trials were suspended due to an investigation into D.C police officers practicing misconduct in drugs and money raids. Furthermore, 12 inmates who have been found guilty and sent to prison, had their convictions dismissed.
Here at Top Secret Writers we endeavor to share with readers news about authority misconduct and police cover ups. For example (3), in 2012, TSW reporter Dennis wrote about two former Tennessee sheriff deputies being indicted for violating civil rights of Darrin Ring. According to Ring, the Tennessee Sheriff Deputies stripped him naked in the snow, beat him and then shocked him with a stun device during his arrest.
Another case of authority misconduct/corruption took place in August this year. One of the leading undercover FBI agents who had gathered the political corruption case against Leland Lee the California state Senator, was dismissed from the investigation due to his own financial indecorums.
The release of more than a dozen criminals due to implications involving an FBI agent is just the latest example of agents being placed under investigation for their own corruption or misconduct.
Black people in the Louisville area were arrested two to three times more often than non-blacks in 2011 and 2012, according to a study of FBI data conducted by USA Today.
Specifically, blacks were 2.6 times more likely to be arrested by Louisville Metro Police and 6.6 times more likely to be arrested by St. Matthews Police, the highest ratio in the state, the data show.
Shively Police, meanwhile, showed the lowest disparity of 11 departments in the area, with blacks being 1.2 times more likely to be arrested. The national disparity rate was 3.2, according to the study.
The study comes after tensions between law enforcement and civilians were cast into the national spotlight after a white police officer shot a black teen in Ferguson, Mo. A grand jury decision on whether to indict the officer is expected this week.
The USA Today data showed blacks in Ferguson were 2.8 times more likely to be arrested than non-blacks.
Jeannine Bell, a law professor at Indiana University, said while the disparities do not equal discrimination, it’s important to “tease out what is happening” to determine if policies could be improved.
Police say many things factor into arrests and that should be taken into account when discussing the disparity.
Louisville Metro Police spokeswoman Alicia Smiley said that you have to look at why each arrest was made.
“One of the things that we have to do rather than just relying on plain numbers … is you have to look at the validity of each arrest,” Smiley said. “Basically that comes down to examining each individual arrest to see when it occurred, why it occurred, where it occurred, what were the charges, etc.”
Black people represented 43.7 percent of the 62,532 arrests reported to the FBI by metro police in 2011 and 2012, while Louisville is about 23 percent black, according to 2010 U.S. Census data.
The analysis shows that disparities across the nation fall on a wide spectrum. Some towns show no signs of racial disparity, while in others — such as Livingston, N.J. — blacks are 43 times more likely to be arrested than non-blacks.
Of the 3,538 police departments examined, only 173 arrested black people at a rate lower than other racial groups.
A look at 11 local police and sheriff’s departments — including departments in Indiana and Oldham County — showed the largest disproportion in arrests occurred in St. Matthews. That small city is about 6 percent black, yet blacks made up nearly 30 percent of arrests by its police department in 2011 and 2012.
Calls to St. Matthews Police were not returned Tuesday.
Elsewhere, blacks were 2.6 times more likely to be arrested in Jeffersontown, and 2.5 times more likely to be arrested in Oldham. Bullitt County was not included in the USA Today analysis.
In Indiana, Clarksville Police showed a disparity of 3.6. But in neighboring Jeffersonville, blacks were only 2 times more likely to be arrested.
The Clark County Sheriff’s Office had a disparity of 2.2, and New Albany Police came in at 2.9.
Bell said that law enforcement agencies with pronounced disparities should examine their practices and not rely on existing profiling seminars or in-service training.
“It doesn’t seem fair, especially given history, to show a differential arrest rate and automatically accept what law enforcement may say about it, which is to say this is based on law-breaking rates,” Bell said, adding that actual incidence of crime and arrest rates might not necessarily match up based off policing styles.
Ricky Jones, director of the University of Louisville’s Center on Race and Inequality, said the disparity “needs to be given proper weight.” Public policy needs to focus on the problems affecting blacks across the country, he said, which is still plagued by a history of discrimination.
“Police officers come from that society,” Jones said. “I’m not saying all police are racist. Absolutely not. But racial stereotypes and norms play into policing just as they do other parts of life.”
In Indiana, an analysis of the Floyd County Sheriff’s Department showed black people were 3.4 times as likely to be arrested.
Major Andrew Sands, Floyd County Jail Commander, said he’s seen the racial disproportion of arrests stay consistent from year to year, but there are other factors to take into account.
“There’s probably some more data we should be collecting on the jail side to better explain the numbers to folks to make it not so ‘the police are profiling,’ ” Sands said. “I think you need to look at it from multiple areas and not just race.”
He suggested looking at socio-economic status and said policing based off crime “hot spots” can help reduce the fears of profiling.
Just last month, a study of recent traffic stops commissioned by Louisville Metro Police stated that there was no definitive proof of racial profiling by the department. The study also showed racial disparity, with black people searched and arrested about twice as often as other drivers, according to the data analyzed by U of L researchers.
African-Americans were arrested at some of the highest rates in the country in Monmouth and Ocean counties, according to a review of FBI records.
The statistics for 2011-2012 show that in several Shore communities, blacks accounted for up to 44 percent of arrests in towns where the black population was less than 15 percent of total residents, according to the FBI data compiled by USA Today. Of the 19 local police departments that self-reported their arrest numbers to the FBI, the biggest disparities were seen at the Monmouth County Sheriff’s Department and the Wall police department in Monmouth, and the Lakewood police department in Ocean.
Arrest rates and race have come into sharper focus in recent weeks following the shooting death of a Michael Brown, a black, unarmed suspect, by a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri. But while the FBI statistics show the racial disparity, a gulf of opinions divide the reasons. Some people of color will quickly point to the disparity as racial profiling of African-Americans. While it could be an underlying factor, police agencies and others say that there are a number of reasons that go beyond race.
“It doesn’t mean that police are discriminating,” David Harris, a University of Pittsburgh law professor, told USA Today. “But it does mean it’s worth looking at. It means you might have a problem and you need to pay attention.”
Harris said that while “disparity is not discrimination,” people whose local police departments have disparity issues “would have a legitimate reason to go to his or her police department and say what gives, explain this.”
Brookdale Community College student Jeffrey “Jay” Michel recounts the moments before his arrest on the Middeltown campus that was captured in a viral video. VIDEO EDITED BY THOMAS P. COSTELLO
The Monmouth County Sheriff’s Department, which had the most arrests of the 19 police agencies in both counties, showed the greatest disparity. In 2011-12, 6,768 arrests made and 3,010 were of black suspects, or 44.5 percent, according to USA Today’s analysis. Monmouth County has a black population of 7 percent, or about 46,400 residents. The arrests were mostly because of outstanding warrants, according to the Monmouth County Prosecutor’s Office.
In Wall, a township where just 638 of its 26,100 residents are black, 17 percent of their arrests — 468 of them — were African-Americans. In Lakewood, where just 6 percent of the population is black, 35 percent of the arrests in 2011-2012 were of African-Americans.
“The hard questions you want to answer is what’s behind those numbers, what types of crimes they are, the and the time period,” said Al Della Fave, the spokesman for the Ocean County Prosecutor’s office. Of note, the Ocean County Sheriff’s Department reported that nearly 45 percent of its arrests in 2011-2012 were of African-Americans.
Brookdale student Jeffrey “Jay” Michel is interviewed at the Asbury Park Press in Neptune, NJ, Tuesday, November 18, 2014. His arrest at Brookdale Community College was captured in a viral video. STAFF VIDEO BY BRIAN JOHNSTON
Calls to Wall Township police and the Monmouth County Sheriff were not returned. Della Fave, who said that a majority of the Ocean County Sheriff’s Department’s arrests come from outstanding warrants, offered the fluctuating population of the Shore as another explanation for the some of the skewed numbers.
“Our county is strange because we have the summer influx,” he said. “We have two populations: we have the winter population and we have the summer population.
“During the vacation season, the population almost quadruples,” he added. “You’ve got to take that into account.” Della Fave also said that prosecutor Joseph Coronato, who took office in 2013, would look into the numbers to get a better understanding of why disparity is happening.
Fred Rush has a long history of witnessing and dealing with racial tension and racial issues in Lakewood. The president of Ocean County’s NAACP chapter said that the numbers, particularly in Lakewood, are indicative of a bigger problem between the police and its black residents.
“One would say that it because of the community we live in,” Rush said. “We are essentially three communities: the Orthodox, the Hispanics and blacks. It’s a big concern of ours and we’re trying to deal with it.”
Rush said that they have noticed the disparities for years and he also wonders what the real answers are, feeling that no straight answers are given.
“You can ask that question as many times as they want and they will tell you that they don’t (racially) profile,” Rush said. “But one has to believe to some degree that they do. In Lakewood, that’s something that I notice.
“I go to the courts a lot and I’ll just sit and look at the disparity,” he added. “When you look at the (black) population and then look at our courts. There’s a few scattered Caucasians, a lot of Hispanics, and then blacks and that’s just on the municipal level.”
Lakewood Police Chief Robert Lawson could not be reached for comment.
Rush acknowledged that profiling is not the only reason behind the disparity in arrests, saying that societal factors such as lack of education, unemployment and a damaged family structure help contribute to criminal behavior.
“All that goes on here, and it’s not condoned, but I would surely say that this is not a way of life here,” Rush said. “Disparities are disparities and discriminatory and it’s a big problem here in Lakewood.”
Rush said that a lot of the issues in Lakewood do not receive much exposure. He said that the problems of African-Americans, particularly young black men, being arrested is a distinct problem that goes beyond numbers.
“It’s not something that we just noticed,” he said. “You can bring out statistics, but we live it every day and we see it. There’s more of a propensity for (a black male) to get stopped than for somebody white.”
“Do we have problems? Yes. We have tremendous problems,” he added. “You don’t really have to be extremely educated to see the disparate treatment of our people and especially with the justice system. You don’t have to be a rocket scientists to know that.”
Newton Police Photo – Jason R. Miller, 37, of Hampton,
NEWTON — A Newton police officer was caught on videotape unzipping his pants and exposing himself to young men during at least five traffic stops, an arrest affidavit says.
Jason R. Miller, 37, of Hampton, was arrested on allegations that he exposed his genitals to motorists “to satisfy his prurient interests” and then let them leave without issuing traffic summonses, a complaint filed Monday says.
Miller, a police officer since July 2001, turned himself in at the Sussex County Prosecutor’s Office Monday and was released on $35,000 bail with a 10 percent option. He is indefinitely suspended without pay pending the outcome of the criminal case.
“The allegations against Jason Miller represent a grave abuse of authority for which there is absolutely zero tolerance,” a press release from the Newton police and prosecutor’s office said.
He was charged with two counts of second-degree official misconduct, one count of third-degree pattern of official misconduct and the disorderly persons offense of lewdness.
Miller’s attorney, Anthony Iacullo, said his client “vehemently denies these allegations.”
“He is an excellent officer and has served Newton for over a decade,” Iacullo said. “When this case is litigated in the court of law, we are confident that he will be exonerated as it relates to all charges.”
The investigation began on Oct. 23 when the Newton Police Department received an anonymous email tip from a man who felt sexually harassed when a Newton police officer allegedly exposed himself during a traffic stop.
After reviewing a videotape of the stop, Newton police and detectives from the prosecutor’s office tracked down the complainant, referred to as A.B., and interviewed him about the incident.
The investigation found the following, according to the arrest affidavit:
• A.B., a 22-year-old man, was driving home from O’Reilly’s Pub around midnight Oct. 23 when he was stopped on Lower Spring Street. The officer took A.B.’s paperwork and went back to his vehicle.
He then returned to A.B.’s vehicle and explained that he was not giving him a ticket. At that time, A.B. noticed the officer’s zipper was down and it appeared as though his genitals were exposed.
A.B. told investigators a friend of his, referred to as K.K., had a similar experience with a Newton officer and gave them K.K.’s name and phone number.
• K.K., a 23-year-old man, told police he was driving his friend home one night when he was stopped on Clinton Street. During the stop, the officer allegedly asked if K.K. noticed the officer’s zipper was down and he answered no.
Once the stop was over, K.K. dropped his friend off at his house and turned onto Water Street.
He then realized the officer was following him again so he drove to Stuart Street and then Diller Avenue. He then crossed onto Sussex Street and as he was about to turn left on Pine Street when the officer pulled up next to him and motioned for him to roll down his window.
K.K. complied and the officer again asked if he noticed that his fly was down. K.K. said no.
The officer then asked if the person he was dropping off was his boyfriend. K.K. said no and told him he has a girlfriend. The officer then told him to have a good night and left the area.
K.K. told investigators he thought the officer was playing “some sick joke” since he never noticed or looked at the officer’s fly.
After finding the first two men, the police reviewed videos and audio recordings of Miller’s traffic stops. According to the arrest affidavit, the following was found:
• J.A., an 18-year-old man, was stopped on Plotts Road on Sept. 2. When the officer approached, J.A. noticed the zipper was down and thought Miller was either exposing himself or wearing pink or flesh-colored underwear.
The officer did not issue a ticket to J.A. even though his registration and insurance were both expired.
J.A. also saw through his rearview mirror the officer zip up his pants at the end of the stop. Video shows Miller attempting to cover his genital area and placing his hand inside the opening as he walks back to his car.
• N.S., a 26-year-old man, was stopped on Aug. 31 at 2:39 a.m. but was not issued a ticket. Video shows the officer’s pants open and his genitals exposed.
• C.S., a 26-year-old man, was stopped on March 18 at 12:58 a.m., for driving 16 mph over the speed limit. C.S. acknowledged coming from a bar and drinking alcohol, but Miller did not issue him summonses or investigate whether C.S. was driving while intoxicated.
The audio recording appears to have the sound of a zipper either opening or closing.
The Newton police and prosecutor’s office are continuing to investigate and review tapes of late night and early morning stops involving Miller and young men.
The two said the investigation was made possible by the witnesses who came “forth despite feelings that there could be potential retaliation” and because of the Newton Police Department’s systems “to encourage community engagement as well as maintaining a culture of accountability and responsiveness to the public.”
The press release said there is no indication that other Newton police officers knew about the misconduct.
Police are asking that persons who experienced similar incidents or who have information about the allegations contact the Sussex County Prosecutor’s Office at 973-383-1570.
Miller is scheduled to be in court on Wednesday, Nov. 26.
A Baltimore cop who insisted on arresting the wrong guy is in trouble, a suburban Chicago cop who tried to be a little too helpful to some women has lost his job, and a Tennessee cop facing federal drug-related money laundering charges retires with his benefits. Let’s get to it:
In Baltimore, a Baltimore police officer was charged last Fridaywith arresting on drug charges a man he knew was innocent. Officer Steven Slack was part of an arrest team directed to detain a man observed by hidden officers making a hand-to-hand drug deal, but he placed the wrong person under arrest. Even though he was informed by the observing officers that he had the wrong guy, Slack arrested him anyway and wrote up an arrest report claiming he had committed the crime. Slack is now charged with official misconduct and perjury.
In Newport, Tennessee, a Newport police officer facing money laundering charges retired last Wednesday. Former Captian Roger Lynn Schults, 54, had been indicted in July on one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering and three counts of money laundering along with another Newport police officer, the officer’s wife, who is a city alderwoman, and their son. The federal charges involve a hydrocodone distribution ring. It looks like Schults will get his retirement benefits, too, according to his brother, Newport Police Chief Maurice Schults.
In Hoffman Estates, Illinois, a Hoffman Estates police officer has resigned after being caught phoning female partiers at a local hotel and warning them that police were on the way because of a marijuana smoke and loud noise complaint. The officer, who has not been named, had met the two women earlier in the evening during a traffic stop. One of the women, who was later arrested on a prostitution charge, told arriving officers “one of your cops keeps calling us, and he just called telling us the cops were on the way.” He signed a separation agreement with the department in September, and faces no administrative or criminal charges.
Georgia’s supreme court has thrown out a videotaped confession allegedly made by a murder suspect.
On Monday, they ruled that Baldwin County investigator continued to question suspect Artenimus Mack after he said he didn’t want to talk anymore.
The court said the Baldwin sheriff’s office violated his constitutional right to remain silent.
Mack is accused of killing Travin Montez Davis, who was found shot to death by the side of a road in Baldwin on Oct. 31, 2012.
The murder case has not yet gone to trial.
Mack is currently in state prison, serving time on an unrelated case.
Monday’s ruling means that his confession in the Davis can’t be used in his trial.
According to the Georgia Supreme Court’s account of the case, Mack was arrested on Nov. 1, 2012 in Gwinnett County with 2 pounds of marijuana in his car.
He said he saw another man shoot Davis during a drug deal.
When officers accused him of lying, according to the court, Mack said several times, “I’m done.”
“Ya’ll going to sit here and just tell me my story is a lie…I have no more to say,” he added. “You’re going to charge me, man, charge me. Take me in. Let’s rock. I’m ready to go.”
Baldwin County investigator Robert Langford continued to question him that night and again the next day.
On the night of Nov. 1, the court says, Mack asked to speak to Langford again and confessed to the shooting.
A grand jury charged him with murder, armed robbery, aggravated assault and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.
His lawyer later argued that Langford violated Mack’s right to remain silent.
The trial court ruled that Mack “did not unequivocally invoke his right to remain silent” and that he “purposefully reinitiated” the final conversation with the investigator.
The state Supreme Court disagreed. They said Langford “blatantly ignored” Mack’s Fifth Amendment rights on Nov. 1 and, the next day, “repeatedly implored, badgered, and cajoled Mack to tell the truth.”
Mack is currently serving time in Ware State Prison after being convicted of aggravated assault, battery and other charges in Washington County last year.