Former Reserve Police Officer Pleads Guilty to Alerting Drug Dealers to FBI Search Warrant

ATLANTA—Former Clarkston Reserve Police Officer Gabriel Hoskins, 40, of Atlanta, pleaded guilty today in federal district court to tipping off two suspected drug dealers that the Federal Bureau of Investigation intended to execute a search warrant on their home.

United States Attorney Sally Quillian Yates said, “The integrity of law enforcement is critically important to all law-abiding citizens. Although the vast majority of police officers serve and protect their communities honorably, this police officer’s criminal betrayal placed his fellow law enforcement officers at risk when he alerted suspected drug dealers that a federal search warrant was about to be executed.”

Brian D. Lamkin, Special Agent in Charge, FBI Atlanta Field Office, stated, “Interfering with a federal investigation is a serious offense in and of itself, but when the individual is part of the law enforcement community, it rises to another level. The FBI will continue to aggressively identify, investigate, and put forward for prosecution those individuals who would betray the public’s trust as this defendant did in this case.”

According to United States Attorney Yates, the charges, and other information presented in court: Hoskins worked as a Clarkston Reserve Police officer and part-time security guard for an apartment complex in Atlanta. He also served as a DeKalb County Police Officer until November 2010.

In June 2011, while working as a security guard in the apartment complex, he encountered a United States postal inspector who asked about the occupants of an apartment located in the complex. After learning Hoskins was a Clarkston Reserve Police officer, the postal inspector confided to him that federal agents were planning to execute a search warrant on the apartment because law enforcement believed the occupants were drug dealers.

Later that day, Hoskins alerted the suspected drug dealers that federal agents planned to raid the apartment soon and encouraged them to clear everything out. Because one of the drug dealer’s telephone was tapped, agents soon learned Hoskins had tipped them off to the search. To test whether it was Hoskins, the FBI had the postal inspector return to the complex and falsely inform Hoskins that they had been looking for the previous occupants of the apartment, so no search would be necessary. Later that same day, on the tapped telephone, Hoskins notified the drug dealers the FBI actually did not intend to execute a search warrant at all.

When confronted by special agents with the FBI, Hoskins admitted he had notified the suspected drug dealers about the search warrant. He said that in February or March 2011, he pawned his .40 caliber handgun to one of the drug dealers in exchange for $500. Hoskins said he was nervous that if law enforcement found the gun inside the apartment, he would get in trouble and lose his police officer certification. Hoskins related that after the postal inspector left, he called one of the drug dealers to tell him about the search in an effort to get his gun back.

Hoskins is no longer employed by the Clarkston Police Department.

Hoskins pleaded guilty to one count of providing notice of a search warrant to prevent the seizure of evidence. He could receive a maximum sentence of five years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000. In determining the actual sentence, the court will consider the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which are not binding but provide appropriate sentencing ranges for most offenders.

Hoskins was indicted in January 2012.

The sentencing has not yet been scheduled.

Posted in Law Enforcement Arrest | Leave a comment

Former Essex County Sheriff’s Officer Indicted for Using Extortion to Help Collect a Debt

ng threats of violence to collect a debt owed to another man, U.S. Attorney Paul J. Fishman announced.

A federal grand jury Indictment unsealed today charges John Balsamo, 48, of West Long Branch, New Jersey, with conspiring to collect a debt and collecting a debt using extortionate means. He was arrested this morning at his residence by special agents of the FBI and is scheduled to make an initial appearance today before U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael A. Shipp in Newark federal court.

According to documents filed in this case:

Balsamo and his co-conspirators, Timothy Kelly, 36, of Jersey City, New Jersey; and Robert C. Bantang, Jr., 43, of Oceanport, New Jersey, used threats of violence and economic harm to the victim, an Ocean County construction contractor, and others in order to collect $50,000 the victim owed to Kelly from 2009. The co-conspirators made the victim believe that the money he had borrowed from Kelly was owed to the “Old Man,” a member of organized crime who would hurt the victim if the debt was not paid. Balsamo also displayed a key to a construction site where the victim was working in Brick, New Jersey and warned that it could be used to gain access to the site. Balsamo and Kelly sent Bantang to the construction site on three occasions to deliver threats purportedly on behalf of the Old Man.

On March 24, 2011, Balsamo and Kelly went to the Brick construction site, which was now a completed restaurant, to confront the victim. Kelly told the victim that if he had brought his “boys” that it would have gotten “done right in here, right in this place, right like this, in front of everybody…and your wife gets it, too.” Balsamo warned that the Old Man wanted to “beat the s—t” out of the restaurant owner due to the victim’s failure to repay the debt, which Balsamo and Kelly now stated had grown to $70,000. Balsamo also advised the victim that the Old Man had been “promoted,” implying that he now possessed a higher position in organized crime.

During the course of the conspiracy, Balsamo received a Rolex watch and $2,500 in cash from the victim towards payment of the debt.

Kelly and Bantang previously pleaded guilty in February 2012 to conspiring to collect a debt from the victim using extortionate means, before U.S. District Judge Katharine S. Hayden.

Balsamo faces a maximum potential penalty per count of 20 years in prison and a fine of $250,000.

U.S. Attorney Fishman credited special agents of the FBI, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Michael B. Ward in Newark; and special agents of the New Jersey State Commission of Investigation, under the direction of Executive Director Phillip James Degnan.

The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorney Leslie F. Schwartz of the U.S. Attorney’s Office Criminal Division in Newark.

The charges and allegations contained in the indictment are merely accusations, and the defendant is considered innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Posted in Law Enforcement Arrest | Leave a comment

Wilcox sheriff, son and jailer face additional federal civil rights charges

WASHINGTON – The Justice Department, along with U.S. Attorney Michael J. Moore, Middle District of Georgia, today announced that a grand jury returned a superseding indictment against former Wilcox County Sheriff Stacy Bloodsworth; his son, Austin Bloodsworth; and former Wilcox County Jailer Casey Owens.

The superseding indictment charges the defendants with assaulting three different inmates inside of the Wilcox County Jail on July 23, 2009, thereby violating their civil rights.  As a result of the assaults, one inmate suffered a broken jaw, and two other inmates sustained bruises and scratches.

The indictment also charges the defendants with conspiring to cover up the assaults.  In addition, Stacy Bloodsworth and Austin Bloodsworth were charged with lying to the FBI, while Owens was charged with writing a false report about the incident.  Stacy Bloodsworth was charged with tampering with one of the victims, as well as two witnesses.

In addition to the civil rights and obstruction of justice charges stemming from the assaults that took place on July 23, 2009, the superseding indictment also charges Stacy Bloodsworth with violating the civil rights of individuals on two other occasions.

Former-Sheriff Bloodsworth is charged with assaulting Wilcox County Jail inmate M.A. in July 2009, causing him to suffer a laceration and pain.  It also charges the former sheriff with assaulting N. S. in November 2009, causing him to suffer a concussion, bruising, and pain.

The civil rights charges carry a maximum penalty of 10 years for each count, and the conspiracy and false statements charges carry a maximum penalty of up to five years.  Additionally, Stacy Bloodsworth faces a maximum penalty of 20 years for each count of witness tampering, while Owens faces a maximum penalty of 20 years for his writing a false report.

A prior indictment, which was unsealed on Feb. 17, 2012, charged Stacy Bloodsworth, Austin Bloodsworth, Owens and former Wilcox County Jail trustee Willie James Caruthers with civil rights violations in connection with the July 23, 2009, assault of the three inmates; with conspiring to cover up the assaults; and with committing various obstruction of justice offenses.

On April 4, 2012, defendant Caruthers pleaded guilty to acting with several others, including law enforcement officials, to assault an inmate in the Wilcox County Jail on July 23, 2009.  Caruthers also pleaded guilty to conspiring to tamper with a witness in connection with the assault.  During his plea hearing and in his factual basis, Caruthers admitted that he, along with several other individuals, including law enforcement officers, assaulted Wilcox County inmate K.H., causing K.H. to suffer a broken jaw.

Caruthers further admitted that he was present when several individuals, including then-Sheriff Bloodsworth, assaulted inmates K.F. and T.O., causing both of them to sustain bruises, scratches and pain.  Caruthers further admitted that he conspired with several other people, including Stacy Bloodsworth, to cover up the fact that law enforcement officials and others had used excessive force against inmates K.H., K.F. and T.O.

Caruthers acknowledged that the plan of the conspiracy was for the co-conspirators to prepare false reports and submit them to Wilcox County Sheriff’s Office officials, and to make statements consistent with those false reports to anyone inquiring about the excessive use of force incident.

When Caruthers is sentenced, he faces a maximum penalty of up to 10 years on the civil rights violation, and a maximum penalty of up to five years on the conspiracy charge.

On March 5, 2012, former South Central Georgia Drug Task Force Agent Timothy King Jr., 31, pleaded guilty to a bill of information charging him with conspiring to tamper with a witness in connection with the July 23, 2009 assaults of inmates K.H., K.F. and T.O.

During his plea hearing, King admitted that he conspired with several other people, including a law enforcement official, to cover up the fact that law enforcement officials and others had used excessive force against the three inmates.  When King is sentenced, he faces a maximum penalty of up to five years.

This case was investigated by the FBI and is being prosecuted by Senior Litigation Counsel Gerard V. Hogan and Trial Attorney Christine M. Siscaretti of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and Assistant United States Attorney Paul C. McCommon III of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Georgia.

An indictment is a formal accusation of criminal conduct, not evidence of guilt. The defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Posted in Law Enforcement Arrest | Leave a comment

Authorities: Ex-judge in TN faces federal charges in ongoing investigation into pill addiction

KNOXVILLE, Tenn. — A former Tennessee judge who authorities say was addicted to prescription painkillers has been indicted on federal charges that he did not report the commission of a felony.

The U.S. attorney’s office in Knoxville said in a statement that former Criminal Court Judge Richard Baumgartner entered a plea of not guilty to the seven counts of misprision of a felony during his court hearing Tuesday.

He was released pending a trial set for July 18. If convicted, Baumgartner could face a term of three years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000 on each count.

Baumgartner’s attorney, Donald A. Bosch, emailed a statement acknowledging the indictment and declining to comment.

Helm said she could not release the charges he was arrested on because his case was still under seal but said he was scheduled to appear in court on Tuesday.

Kristin Helm, a spokeswoman for the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, said the former judge was arrested by TBI agents on Tuesday afternoon in Knox County.

Helm said it was part of an ongoing investigation into Baumgartner, who resigned from the bench and pleaded guilty to a state charge of official misconduct last year after a TBI investigation found he was having sex and buying pills during his courtroom breaks.

A special judge handed Baumgartner a sentence that allowed him to wipe the felony conviction off his record if he stayed out of trouble. The sentence also allowed Baumgartner to avoid jail time and keep his pension, but it did not preclude charges stemming from a federal prosecution.

According to the TBI investigation, one of his drug suppliers was Deena Castleman, who graduated from Baumgartner’s drug court. The indictment says in 2009 and 2010 Baumgartner concealed information he knew about a drug conspiracy involving Castleman to other judges, a prosecutor and the staff at a hospital where she was hospitalized.

Another judge sentenced Castleman in December to serve six years in prison for convictions that included possession of prescription painkillers.

Posted in Law Enforcement Arrest | Leave a comment

Former magistrate sues Cline, sheriff, other officials

DURHAM – A magistrate who resigned last year has sued three former or current members of the Durham County Sheriff’s Office, former District Attorney Tracey Cline and several other officials, alleging that they worked improperly to force him from office.

Sam Biers and his lawyer, Durham attorney Bob Ekstrand, allege the officials retaliated against Biers because he was trying to expose wrongdoing by three of his former colleagues in the magistrate’s office.

Filed in federal court on April 13, the suit along with Cline targets sheriff’s Maj. Paul Martin, Sheriff Mike Andrews, former Sheriff Worth Hill, Durham County government as a whole and the state of North Carolina.

It accuses the defendants of civil-rights violations, slander, libel, malicious prosecution, conspiracy and obstruction of justice. Biers is seeking monetary damages.

State officials “expressly authorized and subsequently ratified” Cline’s role in the affair, making their government liable, Ekstrand and Biers argued.

They used similar terms to argue the county is responsible for Martin’s acts.

Biers resigned last year – five months after taking office – as a judge was preparing to hear arguments about whether he should be removed.

Martin had filed a complaint alleging that Biers, while seeking a magistrate’s post, had given officials “falsified documentation,” specifically an incorrect birth date, to deceive them “about his true identity to hide part criminal history information.”

Another complaint, filed by a woman named Kenya Newell, alleged that Biers had been “arrested and convicted of criminal offenses in both Nevada and Michigan including breaking and entering and unlawful use of a motor vehicle.”

Biers on resigning said he hadn’t deceived anyone because, legally speaking, he doesn’t have a criminal record.

“It was all expunged and sealed,” he said in his resignation letter.

He and Ekstrand contend officials acted against him because he’d reported that former Chief Magistrate Elaine Evans “unlawfully carried a handgun without a permit while on duty,” often leaving it “on top of a desk in a penal institution where inmates had immediate access to it.”

The magistrates’ office is in the Durham County Jail. It is a locked suite, and includes a glass booth the magistrates sit in when they’re dealing with inmates, law enforcement and witnesses.

Biers and Ekstrand further allege that Evans “conspired with” Cline “and others to exercise influence over witnesses and the disposition of criminal cases,” including by improperly recalling and altering “properly issued criminal process.”

Evans also engaged in out-of-court communication with witnesses “and other conduct constituting grounds for removal of a magistrate from office,” the suit alleges.

Biers and Ekstrand allege a second magistrate, Apryle Lawson, “improperly took extended leaves of absence for which she collected her regular salary.”

And Biers learned that an audit had “confirmed allegations that another magistrate was unlawfully converting [for personal use] funds held in trust in the magistrates’ office.” The unnamed magistrate was suspended with pay for three days, Biers and Ekstrand allege.

Cline told Senior Resident Superior Court Judge Orlando Hudson that she’d “investigated the matter and determined not to initiate criminal proceedings,” the lawsuit said.

But in April 2011, as the allegations against Biers were surfacing, she sought the release of Biers’ state personnel file. Martin also sought data from authorities in Nevada and Michigan, giving them “false information,” the suit says, to override a court-ordered seal in Michigan dating from 2009 and a Nevada expungement from 2006.

Biers resigned on May 24, 2011. His then-attorney, Patrice Walker, the same day asked a judge to dismiss the removal proceeding because his resignation had rendered it moot.

Evans stepped down as chief magistrate on April 1, 2011.

Her successor, Don Paschall, later said she’d given up the administrative post because its demands at that point were too much for her. He denied that there was any scandalous backstory to the decision and said the Biers affair hadn’t helped public perceptions of the magistrates’ office.

The county has yet to answer the lawsuit. But Assistant County Attorney Bryan Wardell has notified federal court clerks that he’ll be representing Andrews, Hill, Martin, the county and the Sheriff’s Office.

The state hasn’t yet named its lawyer, who may also represent Cline. She was removed from office because of her handling of an unrelated dispute with Hudson.

Biers last year claimed he’d filed a complaint with the N.C. Judicial Standards Commission against Hudson and Chief District Judge Marcia Morey. Hudson hires magistrates and Morey supervises them.

Judicial Standards Commission investigations are secret, by law. The commission has taken no action against Morey or Hudson.

Morey couldn’t be reached Tuesday for comment.

The new lawsuit is at least the fourth federal case Biers has initiated in his 44-year life. Two of the previous suits, one in Utah and another in Michigan, concerned his dismissals from other jobs.

His self-penned complaint in the Michigan case, filed in 2004 against United Parcel Service, included two separate admissions that he’d committed crimes at some point in his life.

Biers in that filing said UPS had “disclosed [his] criminal background” to third parties to avoid liability for an on-the-job back injury. Another passage alluded to his “15-year-old criminal history.”

He also claimed agents of the shipping company in late 2002 had induced authorities to arrest him as a fugitive.

A 2009 press report on the Utah case said his filing there had come after he was sacked as a wildland firefighter, after he’d given Utah officials a report questioning his employer’s handing of money and other matters.

Another Durham assistant county attorney, Maria Inserra, in a court filing last year related to the removal proceeding against Biers said he “has a history of frivolous filings in courts across this country.”

  
Posted in Lawyers | Leave a comment

Charges dropped in Grayslake drug conspiracy

Drug charges against the second of three brothers accused of running a drug ring out of two family-owned Lake County restaurants has been dropped, authorities said.

The case against Jack Papandreou of Waukegan was dismissed Friday due to a lack of evidence, said Papandreou’s lawyer Ed Edens.

Edens said the state couldn’t prove that Jack was potentially selling drugs out of Jack’s Pizza and Burgers in Grayslake and Waukegan because he was serving time in a federal penitentiary in Indiana.

“At present, the case is dismissed and there is no evidence available for a new indictment to be filed,” Edens said. “Jack was not involved in any conspiracy of drugs being sold out of the restaurant.”

Jack Papandreou and his two brothers, Elias and Kostatino “Gus,” were listed as managers of Jack’s Pizza and Burgers in Grayslake and Waukegan when police investigated and busted up to 18 employees at the restaurants for selling drugs to customers.

The Grayslake restaurant, owned by their mother Anna, has been closed since the investigation and indictments against the Papandreou brothers was released by the Drug Enforcement Agency in 2011.

Elias Papandreou pleaded guilty in October 2011 to a misdemeanor count of possession of a controlled substance with an intent to deliver. He was originally charged with criminal drug conspiracy. He served 40 days in jail and paid a $4,800 fine due to the drug conviction.

Kostatino Papandreou remains at large despite a warrant for his arrest.

Posted in Defense Acquittal | Leave a comment

Marissa Alexander Sentenced: Florida Mom Who Shot At Abusive Husband Gets 20 Years In Prison

Marissa Alexander

Marissa Alexander, the 31-year-old Florida woman who fired what her family calls a warning shot at her abusive husband, was sentenced Friday morning to 20 years in prison.

Alexander was convicted of three counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon for firing into a wall near her husband and his two young children at their Jacksonville home in 2010. Alexander has maintained that she wasn’t trying to hurt anyone and that she was standing her ground against a man who had over the course of nearly a year punched and choked her on several different occasions. Alexander says that she believed she was protected that day under the state’s Stand Your Ground Law, which gives people wide discretion in using deadly force to defend themselves.

A judge and a jury disagreed.

The State Attorney’s Office offered a plea bargain that would have sent Alexander to prison for three years, but she rejected it, hoping to convince a jury that she had been defending herself when she fired the weapon.

Alexander’s case has become the latest battleground in a fight against what Alexander’s supporters call the misapplication of the Stand Your Ground Law and Florida’s mandatory minimum sentencing laws, which offer stiff sentences for crimes involving guns.

According to Florida’s 10-20-Life statutes, anyone who pulls a gun during a crime receives a mandatory 10-year sentence. Firing a gun during the commission of a crime equals a mandatory 20-year sentence. Anyone convicted of shooting and killing another person during a crime is sentenced to 25 years to life in prison.

Alexander, who did not have a criminal record before the shooting, was convicted of felony assault with a gun.

“Florida’s mandatory 10-20-life gun law forced the Court to impose an arbitrary, unjust and completely inappropriate sentence,” said Greg Newburn, Florida project director for Families Against Mandatory Minimums, a group that fights to repeal such laws. “As long as Florida keeps its inflexible gun sentencing laws, we will continue to see cases like Ms. Alexander’s.”

Alexander, a mother of three, and her family have vowed to keep fighting.

“It’s like a nightmare that we can’t wake up from,” Helen Jenkins, Alexander’s mother, told HuffPost shortly after the sentencing. “But we just take it one day at a time. Emotionally we are spent, but every day we start over because we have to fight for Marissa.”

Jenkins said the family is currently raising funds to hire another attorney to appeal Alexander’s case.

Angela Corey, the state attorney who oversaw the case against Alexander, said that justice was indeed served and that Alexander was angry and reckless, not fearful, on the night of the shooting. Just because no one was harmed in the incident doesn’t make the shooting any less a punishable crime, Corey said.

“I feel like when someone fires a loaded gun inside of a home with two children standing in the direction where the bullet was fired, we have to have tough laws that say you don’t do that,” Corey told HuffPost. “Justice, with the laws of the state of Florida, was served. But I don’t believe her supporters will ever believe that.”

The Jacksonville courtroom in which Alexander was sentenced was packed with Alexander’s family and supporters. At one point, according to news reports, a group of young supporters stood up and sang or chanted, “We who believe in justice will not rest!”

One by one, Alexander’s family members addressed the court, including Alexander’s mother and father, a sister and a brother who broke down in tears as they talked about their sister and how they believe the system had wronged her.

Alexander’s daughter, Havelin, 11, read from a letter she’d written and questioned “how my mom could be beaten but she’s the one arrested,” according to Lincoln Alexander, the girl’s father and Marissa’s ex-husband.

“That’s the reason why I’m fighting,” Lincoln Alexander told Huffpost. “I’m fighting for my kids … I knew this day was coming and my thoughts were on them. Would they be strong enough?”

If Alexander’s future appeals are unsuccessful, and she serves her full 20-year term in prison, her twins will be 31 years old when she is released. Her youngest will be 22.

“Today was another tough day for them,” Lincoln Alexander said of his kids. “Once they took Marissa away and we walked out of the court and everything was over, that’s when it was toughest.”

On Aug. 1, 2010, a fight between Alexander and her husband, Rico Gray, 36, left her cornered in the couple’s home. She fled into the garage to escape but was trapped behind a jammed door, she stated in court documents. She said she grabbed the gun she kept in the garage, returned to the house and, when Gray threatened to kill her, fired a single shot to ward him off.

Gray ran out of the house with his two sons and called the police. Alexander was arrested and charged. She unsuccessfully invoked her right to stand her ground in court. Alexander’s sentencing comes 435 days after the shooting. It took a jury 12 minutes to find her guilty.

Gray himself admitted in a deposition to abusing “all five of his babies’ mamas except one,” and to hitting Alexander. Alexander’s family and supporters say that Gray’s testimony should not be trusted, because he perjured himself by changing his account of events on the night of the shooting between his early depositions and later court hearings – a claim that was not disputed by Corey, the state attorney.

Alexander’s case has drawn comparisons to the case of Trayvon Martin, the unarmed black teenager shot to death in February by a neighborhood watch volunteer who claimed he shot Martin in self-defense. The shooter, George Zimmerman, was initially released after the police said he was within his legal rights to defend himself. He was later arrested and charged with second-degree murder more than 40 days later.

Both the Martin and Alexander cases have stirred controversy around Florida’s self-defense and gun laws, but it wasn’t until some media pivoted from the Martin case to Alexander’s that her name became known outside of Jacksonville.

Her family has set up a website and has appeared on cable news shows and nationally syndicated radio programs to spread the word about the “injustice” that they believe Alexander has suffered.

But in the past week, Angela Corey, the state attorney (who also is prosecuting Zimmerman in the Martin case), has launched a media offensive to combat what she has called “misinformation” being spread by the family about the circumstances of the shooting.

Shortly after the sentencing, Corey echoed comments she made to HuffPost earlier this week, saying that Alexander’s own actions on the night of the incident and in the following months have landed her in the position that she is in.

While Alexander’s family has portrayed her as a victim at the end of her emotional rope and in fear of her life, Corey says Alexander fired in anger and not in fear. Corey disputes the so-called warning shot into the ceiling with photographs that show bullet holes much lower, going through a kitchen wall and into the living room where Corey said Gray and his boys were.

“The fact that nobody got hurt has to be balanced with the fact that someone could have gotten hurt,” Corey said. “The kids being right next to him changed everything.”

About four months after Alexander was released on bail, on orders to have no contact with Gray, she got into an altercation with him at his home that gave him a black eye, Corey said. Alexander was arrested and charged with battery, to which she pleaded no contest.

Corey said that Alexander’s actions — engaging with a man of whom she claimed to be deathly afraid, and assaulting him — “didn’t show much of her being remorseful” or “being a peaceful person.”

“Everybody is still ignoring that she got out on bond and chose to go back over there and hit him a second time,” Corey said. “That was kind of an indication of where putting her on probation, where you might have been able to do that before, was off the table since she disregarded a judges order.”

Alexander’s family said the second incident took place just days before her newborn would have been dropped off of her insurance, and that she went over to Gray’s home to have him sign paperwork that would have kept the baby insured. The family say that he attacked her that night and provided HuffPost with her medical records, which show that she suffered minor scrapes and bruising on her face, hand and arm.

After the altercation, Alexander left Gray’s house, and Gray called the police.

On Friday Corey’s office provided a police report, photographs and a 911 call that counter Alexander’s claims.

In the police report, Gray claimed that Alexander came over to drop off their daughter, and that when he rebuffed Alexander’s request to spend the night, she “became enraged and began striking him on the face.” Gray said he raised his hands, the report continues, and he yelled out to his sons to call the police. The responding officer wrote that Gray’s children corroborated that account.

When the police contacted her an hour or so later, according to the report, she said she didn’t understand why they were contacting her and that she had an “alibi.” The police noted swelling and a cut under Gray’s left eye and no visible injuries on Alexander. But on the way to the jail, Alexander said she felt light-headed and became unresponsive.

An officer then “observed that there was a small cut under the suspect’s eye that was not there prior to her being placed in my back seat.”

Alexander was rearrested that night and has remained in custody ever since.

Posted in Criminal Defense Articles | Leave a comment

Ex-Newark police officer convicted of corruption, but may avoid jail time

Newark police corruption.JPG

NEWARK — Former Newark Police Officer Darious Smith had just been convicted of plotting with colleagues to steal cash, narcotics and weapons from drug dealers. But the expression on his face today didn’t tell the story of a man now staring at a possible 10-year prison sentence.

“God is great,” the 41-year-old said with a smile outside the Newark courtroom, his parents and attorney at his side.

The jury found Smith guilty of conspiracy to commit official misconduct, official misconduct and theft. But because it also found the amount he took was less than $200, Smith may avoid prison altogether. He was also acquitted of four lesser charges.

The most serious count of second-degree conspiracy may get bumped down to third-degree, which carries a prison term of up to five years, but also the presumption of non-incarceration for first-time offenders. If the conviction remains second-degree, Smith, who has no prior criminal record, faces up to 10 years in prison.

The veteran officer, who has been suspended since he was indicted in 2004, also would have been immediately handcuffed and taken into custody. But Superior Court Judge Peter Ryan allowed Smith to walk out of the courtroom with bail continued. State Deputy Attorney General Cynthia Vazquez, who prosecuted the case, did not object.

Addressing the court after jurors filed out, Ryan called it a “legal impossibility that (Smith) be found guilty of conspiracy in the second-degree. He has to be found guilty in the third-degree.” The judge set June 15 for attorneys to file briefs in support of their positions.

Paul Loriquet, a spokesman for the Attorney General’s Office, said its appellate section in the Division of Criminal Justice is reviewing the issue but the second-degree conspiracy count may survive intact. Smith’s lawyer, Raymond Beam Jr., also said he will seek a new trial but did not provide an explanation. Sentencing is set for July 13.

Smith’s case was part of a larger investigation by the state and Newark police that covered 2002 to 2004 and yielded similar allegations of corruption against a half-dozen city officers.

The jury forewoman read the verdict just before 4 p.m., after more than two days of deliberations in a trial that stretched three weeks. Smith, clad in a gray suit with matching pink shirt and tie, was acquitted of four lesser counts of tampering with public records and falsifying records, for allegations he lied on his police reports. The charges stem from two incidents in 2003 and two in 2004, in which the Attorney General’s Office alleged Smith stole from and extorted drug dealers.

Five witnesses who testified for the state accused Smith of stealing cash from drug dealers, planting drugs and guns on them and making false arrests.

One of the witnesses was Lawrence Furlow, Smith’s former partner on the force who faces identical criminal charges. The state has tried Furlow twice, both times ending in hung juries. His third trial is scheduled for next week, but will likely be pushed back.

Beam told jurors the witnesses, including Furlow and Dudley, should not be trusted because they were either corrupt cops or drug dealers who cut deals with the state to testify against his client. Furlow backed out of a deal he had brokered with the state.

Outside the courtroom, Beam said he was disappointed with the guilty verdict but noted that it showed jurors “didn’t believe some of the state’s case. So they compromised.”

But Attorney General Jeffrey Chiesa said the verdict sent a clear message.

“This police officer betrayed the honor of his uniform and badge by using both to commit crimes,” he said in a statement.

Posted in Law Enforcement Arrest | Leave a comment

Mandatory Minimum Drug Sentences Controversial in US

Federal prosecutors call mandatory minimum sentences one of their best tools in the war against illegal drugs.  The sentences usually call for years of prison time depending on the quantity and type of drugs.  Critics argue that such sentences take away judicial discretion from judges and are partially responsible for the explosion in the U.S. prison population.
In April of 1998, twins Lawrence and Lamont Garrison were about to graduate from Howard University in Washington.  Both worked at the U.S. Justice Department and planned to attend law school.  Then, they got the shock of their lives.

The man who had repaired their car a year earlier was indicted for cocaine and crack distribution. He told drug agents that the Garrisons had been involved in the drug conspiracy.

“They questioned me and showed me a picture of Tito Abea.  They said, ‘Have you ever seen this guy?  And I said, ‘Yes, he fixed my car,’” recalled Lawrence Garrison.

The Garrisons found themselves trapped on the darker side of federal laws that set mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenses, laws intended to make it easier to prosecute drug kingpins.

The garage owner faced a mandatory 10 years to life in prison.  The only way to reduce that sentence was to implicate someone else, the Garrisons.

Critics of mandatory sentences say that is a common practice in drug cases.  They also say the people implicated often have nothing to do with the crime.

“So they will give someone up.  Other times, people actually make up names, and say, ‘Well, yes, so and so did this.  I saw him one time,’” explained Julie Stewart, president of Families Against Mandatory Minimum Sentences.

Lamont Garrison remembers being offered the opportunity to reduce his time.

“They said, O.K. Mr. Garrison, this is your opportunity to help yourself.  ‘Well help myself?  How?  What do you mean?’ ‘Well you know what this is about you guys are doing XYZ, you got to tell us what you are doing,’” recalled Lamont Garrison.

The opportunity to reduce one’s sentence can lead to innocents being fingered for crimes they didn’t commit.

“They call it the best tool in their arsenal.  Because they can hold a hammer over a defendant’s head and say either you give us more Information or you are going to get a five or 10 year sentence,” said Stewart.

But the Judicial Conference of the U.S. opposes to mandatory minimum sentences because they tie judges hands.

The Garrisons were never charged with possession, just conspiracy, and maintain they knew nothing about the drugs. They say they refused to lie and ruin someone else’s life.

A federal jury in Virginia convicted the Garrisons on the testimony of the garage owner and his brother.  Prosecutors presented no other evidence against them.  Julie Stewart says public outcry over drug violence at the time played a role.

“There was an enormous sensitivity around the crack cocaine issue that I think you could have taken just about anybody to trial and charge them with some sort of crack cocaine offense and found them guilty,” Stewart added.

Lawrence served 12 years in prison, his brother almost 14.  The garage owner who implicated them was sentenced to 18 months.  The brothers no longer have any interest in the law.  They say the system is corrupt and that federal mandatory minimum sentences play a big role.

Posted in Criminal Defense Articles | Leave a comment

Former NPD Officer Found Guilty of Shaking Down Dealers

Attorney General Jeffrey S. Chiesa has announced that a former Newark police officer was convicted at trial today of official misconduct for conspiring with other officers to steal cash, drugs and weapons from suspected drug dealers and others.

Darius Smith, 40, was convicted by an Essex County jury of conspiracy, official misconduct, and theft.  He was acquitted of tampering with public records or information and falsifying records. The verdict followed a three-week trial before Superior Court Judge Peter V. Ryan in Essex County.  The second-degree conspiracy to commit official misconduct carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in state prison, the third-degree official misconduct charge carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, and the disorderly persons theft charge carries a maximum term of six months.  Judge Ryan scheduled sentencing for Smith for July 13.

“This police officer betrayed the honor of his uniform and badge by using both to commit crimes,” said Chiesa.  “By ensuring that the few rogue officers are identified and prosecuted, we protect the many fine officers of the Newark Police Department who put their lives on the line each day.  We will continue to aggressively prosecute those who abuse the public trust.”

Smith and another former Newark police officer, Lawrence Furlow, 50, were charged on Oct. 1, 2004 in separate state grand jury indictments.  A third Newark officer, Tyrone Dudley, 44, pleaded guilty on Sept. 23, 2004 to third-degree conspiracy to commit official misconduct for conspiring with other officers, including Smith and Furlow, to steal from suspects.

The indictment against Smith charged that between April 2003 and March 2004, he and other Newark officers engaged in criminal acts including official misconduct and theft as part of a conspiracy to steal money from criminal suspects. The jury found that Smith, while on duty in Newark’s West District, obtained less than $200 from purported drug dealers, criminal suspects and others by “shaking down” the victims and stealing money, drugs and weapons.

The charges against Furlow are pending and he is scheduled to be tried this month. The indictment against Furlow alleges that between December 2001 and December 2003, Furlow conspired with other officers to steal from criminal suspects and others while on duty in Newark’s West District.

The Newark Police Department suspended Furlow and Smith at the time of the indictments.  Smith had been a Newark officer since 1993, and Furlow, since 1996.

The investigation was conducted by Lt. Umar Hakeem and Sgt. William Thomas of the Newark Police Department Internal Affairs Bureau, and Lt. Joseph Waters of the Division of Criminal Justice.  Additional detectives and staff from the Newark Police Department and its Internal Affairs Bureau assisted in the investigation.

The Division of Criminal Justice has established a toll-free Corruption Tipline for the public to report corruption and other illegal activities:1-866-TIPS-4CJ. The public can also log on to the Division Web site at www.njdcj.org to report suspected wrongdoing. All information received through the tipline or webpage will remain confidential.

Posted in Law Enforcement Arrest | Leave a comment